
The
Co-op, the “ethical bank” has surpassed itself!
The
latest events at the Co-op are in keeping with the recent events that have
blighted the banking sector.
The
so called HBoS 3, namely the former Chairman, Lord Stevenson, former
Chief Executives Andy Hornby and Sir James Crosby. These men, according
to the Government's Commission on Banking Standards, led a bank whose
business model was “inherently flawed”, and served on a board that was a
"model of self-delusion". They managed to land the
taxpayer with a £28bn bill for good measure.
Fred
Goodwin , who, according to recent reports, obsessed on
minutiae – from office hygiene to the design of Christmas cards – at the
expense of the responsible strategic management of a world-leading investment
bank, which collapsed spectacularly requiring a £45.8bn government bailout.
However, there is one thing that separates the so called HBoS 3 and Goodwin from Paul Flowers, the now disgraced, former Co-op Bank chairman; at least Stevenson, Crosby, Hornby and Goodwin had CV’s, if not personalities, that might suggest they were up to the job of running a major bank.
However, there is one thing that separates the so called HBoS 3 and Goodwin from Paul Flowers, the now disgraced, former Co-op Bank chairman; at least Stevenson, Crosby, Hornby and Goodwin had CV’s, if not personalities, that might suggest they were up to the job of running a major bank.
In
this blog I will be examining, how the very traits that make leaders
successful, can develop in to dysfunctional dispositions that can cause them to
derail.
In
the Flowers case, there is a bigger governance issue, but again I am not
surprised. In the tradition of putting a DJ and television presenter in
charge of a Broadmoor task force (any half decent background check would have
shown that Saville was not remotely suitable). The Co-op Group put a
Co-op movement activist in charge of its bank (again any half decent
background check would have shown that Flowers was not remotely suitable), for
good measure, like Saville, Flowers had no qualifications to suggest he had the
technical know- how to carry out the duties of the role. These are issues
about governance, and are for another day! However, generally
speaking, I am surprised at how often there are no meaningful background checks
carried out for key executive appointments.
When selecting leaders most
organisations look for the competencies they do want, rather than the behaviours and traits they don't want. In fact, some dysfunctional behaviours, when displayed by intelligent, educated middle class individuals, can be considered an asset. Bullies can be described as "not suffering fools...", egotist as "having self belief ..." , and recklessness as "being willing to take risks". At certain points in the business cycle these personality traits can prove useful, but in the long term they are almost always unhelpful and destructive.
The fact is, when considering individuals for selection or promotion to a leadership role, the focus is usually on the "bright-side" of the candidate’s leadership personality. The bright-side of leadership personality reflects a person’s strengths and weaknesses when they are on their best behaviour.
The fact is, when considering individuals for selection or promotion to a leadership role, the focus is usually on the "bright-side" of the candidate’s leadership personality. The bright-side of leadership personality reflects a person’s strengths and weaknesses when they are on their best behaviour.
·
Self confidence
·
Assertiveness
·
Tough mindedness
·
Attention to detail
·
Drive
However, when selecting
leaders, we rarely consider the "dark-side" of their leadership
personality. "Dark-side"
characteristics are invisible at interview or assessment center, but become
apparent when leaders are under pressure,
or when they let down their guard down.
It’s not difficult to see
how Stevenson, Hornby, Crosby, Goodwin and Flowers have bright side
characteristics that would excite interview panels, shine at assessment centers
and impress on social occasions.
- Goodwin has a very impressive intellect, an eye for detail, and was brimming with self-confidence and self believe.
- The HBoS 3 were bright, savvy, highly experienced business leaders with terrific track records
- Flowers, a politician and a “committee man”, is described as clever, persuasive and forceful
However poor leadership
is not simply just the result of the absence of "bright-side" characteristics.
Individuals can have “dysfunctional dispositions”. Dysfunctional
dispositions are strategies, often developed in childhood, but that
continue to be used in adulthood in ways that are no longer effective. The
over reliance on these inappropriate interpersonal strategies, can become
unhelpful and dysfunctional. In many cases It is not that the person is
inherently bad, but that they have employed the wrong strategies. In that sense, people can be overly
accommodating, overly attentive to detail, overly analytical or overly
assertive. They can, in fact, have "too much of a good thing”.
Paradoxically, the factors that
have helped achieve success in the past in more junior, less strategic or less interpersonally
demanding roles, can be the very factors that are responsible for
derailment. Studies suggest that
when looking back on those whose careers have derailed, there are often little
foibles and peculiarities, around social skills, and emotional regulation such
as:
- Temper tantrums
- Sarcasm or bullying
- It’s never their fault
- Overreaction
Articles, biographies and
press reports often point to the interpersonal idiosyncrasies of
those people whose careers have derailed:
· Fred Goodwin obsessed over minutiae from the colour of biscuits to the design of company Christmas cards. He also bullied those around him, and often intimidated others from speaking their own mind, for fear of his reaction
· Lord Stevenson claimed the reckless lending at HBOS was not his fault, because he was "only there part time"
· Lord Stevenson claimed the reckless lending at HBOS was not his fault, because he was "only there part time"
·
In 2005 Sir James Crosby
sacked Paul Moore, the senior risk manager of HBOS, for warning the bank that
they were getting dangerously exposed. He then replaced him with someone who
had no risk management experience.
· Hornby has been criticised for
establishing a “high pressure sales culture", and for pushing HBOS into risky lending to drive profits, with
little regard for the long-term cost.
·
A picture of Flowers is
emerging as an individual with narcissistic self-belief. He has described
himself as "known for an objective rigour and for asking the questions
others might avoid". He has been described by others as an
insufferable and pompous person, who throws his weight around, and considers
those less educated than him as peasants. Also as some one who doesn't take
blame or criticism. When he was vice chair of the Rochdale Social
Services Committee, it was heavily criticised for taking “at risk” children in to
care, to protect them from alleged satanic abuse. Although no evidence was
ever found to support these claims, Flowers launched a passionate defence of
the staff involved.
At People Based Solutions we
don’t consider it inevitable that dysfunctional dispositions will
prevail. However, we do believe that organisations can make bad
appointments. Looking at the "dark-side" leadership characteristics and identifying potential leadership derailers, can help reduce the liklihood
of poor appointments. However, mangers and leaders who are open and
responsive to feedback, motivated to change, emotionally literate and
behaviourally flexible, have the capacity to deliver effective leadership. With appropriate training and coaching, to
help manage and control their dysfunctional dispositions those in
leadership roles can avoid the pitfalls of their potential derailers.
At People Based
Solutions we offer a leadership selection framework based on the Hogan Suite that helps identify candidates' "dark-
side" dysfunctional dispositions as well
as their "bright-side" characteristics, and how a candidates values and believes accord
with those of the wider organisation or team. Allowing the organisation to decide whether
to appoint or promote, and if they choose to appoint or promote, to identify
where best to focus any coaching or development efforts.
We also offer a leadership development programme the Adaptable Leader with modules that:
· Develop emotional intelligence
· Encourage self-awareness
· Promote behavioural flexibility
This article has been posted by Sean McCann, the Managing Director
of People Based Solutions an HR consultancy specialising in leadership
selection and development. If you would like to know more about the
Adaptable Leader Programme, either public courses or in house for your
organisation, or about support for your leadership pipeline, contact us at:
No comments:
Post a Comment