
Sometimes disagreeing with or correcting other people can be
difficult. These conversations are often difficult due to differences of
opinion about what is the appropriate thing to do. We may also have strong
feelings and emotions regarding the matter being discussed, and often the
outcome of the “difficult conversation” will be important to us.
It is worth remembering, when we step up to a difficult
conversation, it isn’t other people who annoy or upset us. We annoy and upset ourselves! On the face of
it that sounds crazy! But to quote Hamlet: “There is nothing either good or
bad, but thinking makes it so.” In other words the facts don’t speak for
themselves. It isn’t the objective reality that winds people up, but their
subjective interpretation of the objective facts. It is how we feel about an event that cause
the emotional and behavioural response rather than the event itself.
I call it the ABC of interpersonal conflict:
A: The
actual event. The facts, what was said and done. The objective reality.
C: The consequences of the beliefs, which
create feelings and emotions. These feelings and emotions create physical
responses that drive behaviour.
Behaviour is what we say and do in response to a particular situation or
event.
A: The
actual event. It’s five past nine, the meeting was due to start at nine. The team member hasn’t
arrived yet.
B: Potential beliefs
that filter and interpret the facts, i.e. he (the team member) is 5 minutes late:
·
He’s lazy,
·
He’s trying to take advantage of me.
·
He’s got no respect for my position.
C: The consequences of the beliefs on the emotional
response of the team leader.
·
Anger
·
Frustration
·
Fear
·
Confusion
These emotional responses may create a physical reaction:
adrenaline, stomach churning, nausea. These physical reactions drive
behavioural responses:
·
Avoiding
·
Confrontation
·
Passive-aggression
Unfortunately, when we are wound up or upset, we are likely
to be ill prepared to step up to a difficult conversation. When angry,
frustrated, fearful or confused, we are no longer our normal selves. When faced
with a perceived threat, our primitive self feels under attack. When this
happens, our basic instinct is to either kill the threat or avoid it.
When dealing with conflict, we are often at our most
primitive and least effective.
Consequently, if we interpret another person actions or behaviours, as
some form of threat or challenge, our emotions of fear and anger will often
drive our behaviour.
When faced with a perceived threat or challenge we often
choose to deal with it in one of two ways:
·
Clam up: We try to avoid the difficult conversation. We hope if we ignore it, it will go away. We
choose to avoid the conflict or repress our differences. When we do this we
never have our needs met, and the problem is never properly acknowledged or resolved.
·
Come out fighting: We choose to confront the difficult
conversation. We believe the way to sort
it out is to attack, insult or belittle! We may “win” the encounter, and get
what we want, but it will often be at the expense of trust and the long term
relationship.
This article has been posted by Sean McCann, the Managing
Director of People Based Solutions an HR consultancy specialising in developing
emotional intelligence at work, team building, and workplace conflict
resolution. If you would like to know more about how we can help you develop an
assertive approach to workplace differences by:
- Ensuring your
managers are skilled with people
- Helping you to
recruit people who have an assertive approach to conflict and difference
- Helping you to
develop a culture where differences are acknowledged and addressed
courteously
- Train your
managers to handle conflict effectively
- Delivering
workplace mediation
Contact us at: enquiries@peoplebasedsolutions.com
No comments:
Post a Comment